I Prosecuted R. Kelly. This Is Why the Epstein Files Should Be Redacted

Elizabeth Geddes, an assistant U.S. attorney for over 15 years, led the prosecution against R. Kelly.

In her recent essay, she discusses the implications of the upcoming release of the Epstein files.

Within a month, the public may have access to law enforcement materials that are typically not available to them.

This includes investigators’ notes, extensive digital data seized from various devices, wiretap records, and even logs from trips to a private Caribbean island.

The release is mandated by the Epstein Files Transparency Act, which was passed by Congress to aid those harmed by Jeffrey Epstein and to expose individuals connected to his crimes.

However, Geddes argues that the public should not have unrestricted access to such sensitive information.

The broad disclosure of these materials could hinder efforts to prosecute individuals associated with Epstein’s network.

It also poses a risk of further harming Epstein’s victims, who have already suffered greatly due to his actions.

Moreover, the release of this information sets a troubling precedent that could complicate future investigations into criminal activities involving powerful figures.

As the Department of Justice prepares to process these files for public release, Geddes urges reviewers to exercise caution.

They should resist the impulse to disclose everything in bulk and instead carefully consider what should be redacted or withheld.

The goal should be to protect the integrity of ongoing and future investigations while also safeguarding the well-being of victims.

Releasing sensitive information without discretion could undermine the legal system’s ability to hold wrongdoers accountable.

Geddes emphasizes that the justice system must prioritize the rights and safety of victims over public curiosity.

This careful approach is essential to maintain trust in the legal process and to ensure that justice can be served effectively.

In conclusion, while transparency is important, it should not come at the expense of the victims or the integrity of the investigations.

The Epstein files should be handled with the utmost care, ensuring that only necessary information is disclosed while protecting those who have already endured significant trauma.

By advocating for redaction, Geddes highlights the need for a balanced approach that considers both the public’s right to know and the potential consequences of releasing sensitive information.

The justice system must navigate these challenges thoughtfully to uphold its commitment to justice and accountability.